ProtectOurElections is a national collaboration of grassroots organizations that have joined together  to reclaim our democracy, providing oversight to rescue our elections from partisan politics and privatization.

Five recent developments have harmed our elections in significant ways:

1) the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United allowing for unlimited, undisclosed corporate funds to be spent to support pro-corporate candidates; 2) the Supreme Court ruling in Crawford v. in Marion County, upholding Indiana’s draconian photo ID law for elections, paves the way for similar laws that threaten to disenfranchise millions of voters; 3) the MOVE Act included a provision allowing States to implement Internet voting pilot projects, which threatens to undo the substantial gains made in the states since 2003 to deploy paper ballot voting systems and ensure a verifiable vote count; 4) the targeting of voter registration groups and initiatives has helped to reduce the number of legal citizens who are able to exercise their right to vote. 5) the ever increasing privatization of our public elections by corporations using propriety “trade secret” computer hardware and software to cast and count the results in our public elections, outside of the view of the citizenry. To counter and offset these attacks on fair elections, we must quickly pass robust election protection measures. Specifically, we support the passage of legislation to combat voter suppression (such as voter caging, voter roll purging, the disenfranchisement of former felons and draconian polling place photo ID restrictions), increase transparency in vote casting and counting, and reform of campaign finance rules in federal elections. In addition, a strong, national paper ballot requirement, to be fully implemented by 2012, will protect the national electorate in time for the next presidential election and mitigate the growing threat from Internet voting. The recent attempted monopoly of our elections by the merger of ES&S and Diebold/Premier (which fortunately was overturned by the Justice Department) makes clear the need for the federal government to offer strong incentives for states to oversee their own public elections using hand-marked paper ballots without reliance on private corporations and vendors using secret software. On April 29, 2010, a bi-partisan group of Congress members from both houses introduced the DISCLOSE Act to mitigate the corrosive effects of unlimited corporate funding on public elections. The following day, President Obama issued a statement supporting the bill. We also strongly support this bill as a first step toward protecting the fairness and integrity of our elections on behalf of the citizenry — We the People. Building on the DISCLOSE Act, our campaign will support the passage of existing legislation to stop purging, caging, disenfranchisement of felons and much more that is needed to ensure the self-governance envisioned by our Founders in the U.S. Constitution.

'About' have no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

4 × 4 =

ProtectOurElections.org Copyright 2014 All Rights Reserved.

[Submit This Form To Send This FAX Message To Congress And The Department of Justice]

I am writing to ask that you begin impeachment proceedings and urge the U.S. Justice Department to bring criminal charges against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for making false statements on his AO 10 Financial Disclosure forms since 1989 by falsely swearing under criminal penalty that his wife Virginia had no non-investment income. After Common Cause disclosed this on January 21, 2011, Protect Our Elections wrote to the Attorney General requesting criminal prosecution.


As a result, Justice Thomas publicly announced that he amended his financial disclosure forms from 1989 through 2009 to include his wife's income. These amended forms included forms that he filed as part of his judicial nomination process.


Virginia Thomas has received non-investment income since l989, and she worked at the Heritage Foundation from 2003 through 2009, earning at least $120,000 each year, according to the foundation's IRS Form 990s. She then went to work for Liberty Central in a paid position.

Each of the AO 10 Financial Disclosure forms signed by Justice Thomas from 2003 through 2007 states in Section IX that it is certified under oath as follows:

"I certify that all information given above (including information pertaining to my spouse and minor or dependent children, if any) is accurate, true, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that any information not reported was withheld because it met applicable statutory provisions permitting non-disclosure." (Emphasis added.)

In bold capital letters under the signature box that Justice Thomas signed is the following: NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY FALSIFIES OR FAILS TO FILE THIS REPORT MAY BE SUBJECT TO CIVIL AND CRIMINAL SANCTIONS (5 U.S.C. app section 104)

According to 5 U.S.C. app section 104, if charged, Justice Thomas could face up to one year in prison and a criminal fine for each false statement charge, and a civil fine of up to $50,000. Moreover, under the catchall false statement statute, 18 U.S.C. section 1001, Justice Thomas could also face a felony charge for each false statement with a sentence of five years on each.

Judges are presumed to know the law and, according to the Department of Justice Handbook on Prosecutions, a defendant's signature on a document can help establish willfulness and knowledge. See United States v. Tucker, 133 F.3d 1208, 1218 n. 11 (9th Cir. 1998) (noting that signature proved knowledge of contents of return); United States v. Mohney, 949 F.2d 1397, 1407 (6th Cir. 1991) (holding that signature is prima facie evidence that the signer knows the contents of the return); United States v. Drape, 668 F.2d 22, 26 (1st Cir. 1982) (finding that defendant's signature is sufficient to establish knowledge once it has been shown that the return was false).

Hundreds of Americans have been federally prosecuted since 1989 for various types of false statements, many involving checking or not checking a box on a form. Many of those prosecutions involved a single form, and most defendants were not given the opportunity to amend their forms before being prosecuted. Many were found guilty, fined and sent to prison. And some even appealed their cases to the Supreme Court where Justice Thomas sat in judgment of them, upholding their sentences.

Justice Thomas must be held accountable just as were these hundreds of others. This is a matter of justice, rule of law, and equal treatment. People in positions of power cannot be allowed to violate the law, get caught, and get away by merely writing a letter explaining their conduct as an inadvertent misunderstanding. In fact, President Clinton was forced to face impeachment after he was accused of making false statements.

One of the reasons for robust judicial disclosure laws is so litigants can use the information disclosed to decide whether or not to file a motion to disqualify the judge on the basis of a conflict of interest. Clearly, Justice Thomas' failure to disclose his spouse's income for twenty years deprived thousands of litigants who came before him of their right to ask that he disqualify himself from their cases. This fact underscores the harm done by his conduct.

Congress should begin impeachment proceedings, demand an audit of all cases reviewed by Justice Thomas to determine if his failure to disclose affected them, and urge the Department of Justice to investigate and bring charges against him.

We are a nation of laws and no one is above those laws, not even those on the Supreme Court. In fact, on the front of the Supreme Court are these words carved in stone: "Equal Justice Under Law."

The one click form below will send your personal message as a fax to all your government representatives selected below, with the subject "Prosecute and Impeach Justice Clarence Thomas for Falsifying Documents." At the same time you can send your personal comments only as a letter to the editor of your nearest local daily newspaper if you like.

Constituent info:
First: Last:
This information is required by all members of Congress and by most local newspapers for consideration for publication, but is not transmitted in messages sent to any additional "friends" emails.
Addr: Apt/Ste: City:
State: Zip: Phone:
Select your recipients:
 Both my U.S. senators    My member of the U.S. House  
 My nearest daily newspaper    I'd like to choose   No paper
Next add your own personal message on the subject:
All comments should be appropriately respectful and in acceptable taste. If one of your recipients is also a newspaper there is a minimum of 10 and a maximum of about 250 words. Your signature will be added automatically. Submission of this form constitutes authorization to publish your letter in your local newspaper if that option is selected above.

View last 25 messages sent
Submit the email addresses of friends to invite to write as well:
The way to have maximum impact is by sending speak out invitations to as many of your fellow constituents as possible and encourage them to make their voices heard also.
I would like to hear more about this and other issues.
Now send your message(s)
  Just click once

If you need help with the form or for a simplified version of this action page click here.

Submission functions by The People's Email Network, subject to their own terms and conditions