<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Election Protection Strike Force</title>
      <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Attn: Velvet Revolution&apos;s Newest Election Integrity Work and Calls for Action Now at ProtectOurElections.org</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Velvet Revolution is gradually updating our websites. For the time being, this site is not being updated. Instead, we're using one of our sister sites, <a href="http://www.protectourelections.org"><a href="http://www.protectourelections.org" >Protect Our Elections</a>, for our election integrity work. Visit us there or on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/protectourelections">Facebook </a>today!<a href="http://www.protectourelections.org"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="POE-Square-Embassy.jpg" src="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/POE-Square-Embassy.jpg" width="200" height="200" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></a></a>



<!-- Facebook Badge START --><a href="https://www.facebook.com/ProtectOurElections" target="_TOP" style="font-family: &quot;lucida grande&quot;,tahoma,verdana,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-variant: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #3B5998; text-decoration: none;" title="Protect Our Elections">Protect Our Elections</a><span style="font-family: &quot;lucida grande&quot;,tahoma,verdana,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 16px; font-variant: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #555555; text-decoration: none;">&nbsp;|&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.facebook.com/business/dashboard/" target="_TOP" style="font-family: &quot;lucida grande&quot;,tahoma,verdana,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-variant: normal; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #3B5998; text-decoration: none;" title="Make your own badge!">Promote Your Page Too</a><br/><a href="https://www.facebook.com/ProtectOurElections" target="_TOP" title="Protect Our Elections"><img src="https://badge.facebook.com/badge/127973870563001.2087.337717428.png" width="111" height="84" style="border: 0px;" /></a><!-- Facebook Badge END -->
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2011/04/velvet_revolutions_most_uptoda.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2011/04/velvet_revolutions_most_uptoda.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Hot Items</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Facebook</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Protect Our Elections</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">velvet revolution</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What To Do if You Have Problems with an E-Voting Machine Today</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The BRAD BLOG has reposted information we collected in 2008 for your use today:

<a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8170">What To Do If You Have Problems With an E-Voting Machine Today...</a>

    * Call poll supervisors to observe the problem.
    * Fill out a problem report.
    * Refuse to vote on that machine.
    * Request that the machine be taken out of service.
    * Get a serial number of the machine if possible (may be difficult in many cases).
    * Tell other voters in line which machine it was and that they should NOT vote on that machine!
    * Report it to county/town election office.
    * Report it to the Secretary of State.
    * Call local reporters and tell them the story.
    * Call voter problem hotlines (eg. 866-OUR-VOTE) and report it.
    * Contact bloggers and Election Integrity websites.
    * Raise holy hell.

REMINDER: Please bring a video camera/cell phone camera when you go to vote so you can document these problems on video tape. 

More at <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8170">link</a>. 

If you have reason to suspect election fraud, please call Velvet Revolution's whistleblower hotline at 888-VOTE-TIP.

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="DoNotTouchHereToCastBallot_touchscreen_problems.jpg" src="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/DoNotTouchHereToCastBallot_touchscreen_problems.jpg" width="252" height="157" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>

Please keep in mind that the most serious problems with electronic voting are invisible to voters, election officials, and candidates alike. So while it's true that the problems you may run into -- your votes visibly flipping to candidates you didn't choose, machines not working, etc. -- truly are problems, it's even more important to remember that results of an election that appeared to run smoothly absolutely cannot be trusted when votes are counted electronically!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/11/what_to_do_if_you_have_problem.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/11/what_to_do_if_you_have_problem.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Hot Items</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election day problems</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voting assistance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voting problems</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Vote on Paper Ballots!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[New video from <a href="http://velvetrevolution.us">Velvet Revolution </a>co-founder and <a href="http://bradblog.com">BRAD BLOG </a>proprietor Brad Friedman: 

Says Brad, "While computer generated animations are great, computer generated, unverifiable e-voting ain't. Vote on a paper ballot this year (not on a touch-screen system with or without a so-called "paper trail"), if you can. Here's why..."

<object width="400" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/thh6EG1aD7Q?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/thh6EG1aD7Q?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="336"></embed></object>

<script>function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+encodeURIComponent(u)+'&t='+encodeURIComponent(t),'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436');return false;}</script><style> html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/share/facebook_share_icon.gif?6:26981) no-repeat top left; }</style><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=<;http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/11/vote_on_paper_ballots.html>" onclick="return fbs_click()" target="_blank" class="fb_share_link">Share on Facebook</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/11/vote_on_paper_ballots.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/11/vote_on_paper_ballots.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">BRAD BLOG</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Brad Friedman</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Paper ballots</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">video</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">YouTube</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Karl Rove Subpoenaed in Ohio Election Case (Now with Video)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Racketeering charges have been filed by attorney Cliff Arnebeck and a subpoena served on Karl Rove in connection with the King-Lincoln-Bronzeville class action lawsuit, which revolves around the integrity of the 2004 election in Ohio.

<object width="400" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gaH-__fGpFE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gaH-__fGpFE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="440" height="336"></embed></object>

For details, see <a href="http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/10/29/why-we-filed-racketeering-charges-against-karl-roves-election-operations/">Why We Filed Racketeering Charges Against Karl Rove's Election Operations </a>by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman at AlterNet. 

Background on the lawsuit can be found <a href="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2008/09/stay_in_kinglincoln_v_blackwel.html">here </a>and <a href="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2008/09/motion_for_relief_of_stay_file.html">here</a>.

<script>function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+encodeURIComponent(u)+'&t='+encodeURIComponent(t),'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436');return false;}</script><style> html .fb_share_link { padding:2px 0 0 20px; height:16px; background:url(http://static.ak.facebook.com/images/share/facebook_share_icon.gif?6:26981) no-repeat top left; }</style><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=<;http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/karl_rove_subpoenaed_in_ohio_e.html>" onclick="return fbs_click()" target="_blank" class="fb_share_link">Share on Facebook</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/karl_rove_subpoenaed_in_ohio_e.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/karl_rove_subpoenaed_in_ohio_e.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cliff Arnebeck</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election fraud</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Karl Rove</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">King-Lincoln v. Blackwell</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Ohio</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>North Carolina Republican Party Sues Over Vote-Flipping</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Though the Republican and Democratic parties have been largely silent for years as voters and election integrity advocates have repeatedly pointed out the insecurity of electronic voting systems, the GOP in North Carolina has suddenly taken notice. A lawsuit has been filed against the North Carolina State Board of Elections citing evidence of votes visibly flipping from Republican to Democratic candidates in early voting in the Tar Heel State. <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Ess_Meltdown_NC.jpg" src="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/Ess_Meltdown_NC.jpg" width="252" height="184" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>

This is at least the second report of Republican voters watching their votes flip this election, the first being in Texas, where a voter reported a vote intended for Republican Governor Rick Perry flipping to the Green Party slate.

While these reports are indeed disturbing, it's crucial to remember that votes that visibly flip from the intended recipient to another candidate can be evidence of poorly-performed election manipulation. If a hack is done 'right,' the votes will flip invisibly inside the machine and neither the voter, the election workers, or the candidates will ever know. 

Read the full story at VR co-founder Brad Friedman's <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8141">The BRAD BLOG</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/north_carolina_republican_part.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/north_carolina_republican_part.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">e-voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GOP election litigation</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">North Carolina election 2010</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Texas election 2010</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">The BRAD BLOG</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vote flipping</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>&quot;Beware: Election Ahead&quot; -- Say It With Video</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Our colleagues at the <a href="http://www.electiondefensealliance.org">Election Defense Alliance </a>have just released two new videos for you to share with people, especially those who still expect votes to be counted accurately in U.S. elections. Who do you know who needs to hear these messages? Please share on Facebook, by email, by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SySNHUuD0RY">projection on a public building</a>, or ... use your imagination!

<object width="400" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qMQMePcKLBc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qMQMePcKLBc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="336"></embed></object>

<object width="400" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wYbu_14sdyY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wYbu_14sdyY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="336"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/danger_election_ahead_say_it_w.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/danger_election_ahead_say_it_w.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Daily Show</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election Defense Alliance</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election fraud</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Jon Stewart</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Watch Dan Rather&apos;s New E-Voting Investigative Report</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In <em>Das Vote</em>, Dan Rather details the work in Europe that has led to halt to electronic voting in three European countries, and tells a few stories from similar struggles here in the U.S. The entire show can be <a href="http://www.hd.net/danrather.html">viewed online for free </a>until Wednesday, November 3 and thereafter downloaded from <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewTVSeason?i=400570595&id=349321254&s=143441">iTunes </a>for $1.99. 

This show follows a superb Rather Reports investigation shown on HDNet three years ago, which includes startling revelations about how the hanging chads in Florida 2000 came to be. If you don't know this story, you'll want to. View it at <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4960">The BRAD BLOG</a>.

Here's a clip about the 2010 Senatorial primary in North Carolina:
<object width="400" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/satQjrak05o?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/satQjrak05o?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" height="336"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/hdnet_story.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/hdnet_story.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Dan Rather</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Dan Rather Reports</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Das Vote</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic voting in Germany</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HDNet</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">North Carolina Senate primary 2010</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Calling All Hackers And IT Specialists!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<h3>$20,000 Reward For Information About Vote Tabulation Manipulation In 2010 Election</h3>

ProtectOurElections.org has posted the reward for anyone who can provide evidence that vote tabulation results were manipulated in such a way that the results changed the legitimate winner in a 2010 federal election. The information must lead to arrest and conviction in order for the reward to be paid.
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="POE_Hacker Wanted_Poster_1_tiny.gif" src="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/POE_Hacker%20Wanted_Poster_1_tiny.gif" width="200" height="213" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>

For details, see <a href="http://protectourelections.org/index.php?q=node%2F57">ProtectOurElections.org </a><a href="http://www.velvetrevolution.us">VelvetRevolution.us</a> is a partner in ProtectOurElections.org]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/calling_all_hackers_and_it_spe.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/calling_all_hackers_and_it_spe.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Hot Items</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election fraud reward</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election hacking</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election integrity</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">hacking reward</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ProtectOurElections</category>
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hacker Takes Over D.C. Voting System Server!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Computer Science Professor J. Alex Halderman led a team from the University of Michigan to successfully penetrate and manipulate the internet voting system Washington D.C. planned to use for military and overseas voters for the general election.

The team of "white hat hackers" was able to change all of the votes, implant code into the system that would result in any future votes being changed as well, and program the system to play the University of Michigan fight song after a vote was cast.

What they found inside the system was as frightening as their ability to penetrate it in the first place. They were not the only hackers trying to get access. Computers in Iran and China were also attempting to get in. 

Read more at The BRAD BLOG: 
<a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8118">Iranian, Chinese Computers Also Discovered to Have Been Hacking D.C. Internet Voting System</a>
[Note: Brad Friedman, proprietor of <a href="http://www.bradblog.com">The BRAD BLOG</a>, is one of the founders of Velvet Revolution.]]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/hacker_takes_over_dc_voting_sy.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2010/10/hacker_takes_over_dc_voting_sy.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">internet voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">J. Alex Halderman</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">University of Michigan</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voting system hack</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Disgraceful: Discredited E-Voting Vendor VP Appointed to U.S. EAC Advisory Panel</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<h3>Federal body tasked with overseeing U.S. certification of e-voting systems appoints scammer Edwin Smith, VP of e-voting companies Sequoia, Dominion, Hart-Intercivic...</h3>

Cross-posted from <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7575">The BRAD BLOG</a>
Note: Brad Friedman, proprietor of The BRAD BLOG, is a co-founder of Velvet Revolution. 

<img src="http://www.BradBlog.com/Images/EdwinSmith_EACAppointment2.jpg" hspace="6" vspace="3" border="0" align="right">Incredible. This would be the equivalent of appointing the sitting Vice President of Exxon Mobil to an EPA advisory committee, but Ed Smith has now been appointed to the disastrous U.S. Election Assistance Commission's (EAC's) Technical Guidelines Development Committee as one of their new "Technical and Scientific Experts."

From the EAC's email announcement on Friday (posted in full at end of article):

<div class="media"><b>Edwin B. Smith, III, vice president of compliance and certification at Dominion Voting Systems.</b> Before joining Dominion Voting Systems, Mr. Smith was vice president of manufacturing, compliance, quality and certification at Sequoia Voting Systems. He also served as the operations manager at Hart InterCivic and the senior director of operations at K*TEC Electronics. He holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix and a Bachelor of Science in engineering technology from Texas A&M.</div>

So Smith went from voting machine company Hart Intercivic to voting machine company Sequoia Voting Systems and is now at voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems, where he is a VP, selling e-voting systems to jurisdictions around the country that receive federal money doled out by the EAC. And now he'll also sit on an advisory board <i>at</i> the EAC helping to advise which one of those companies sees their systems certified for use in U.S. elections by the EAC. Just amazing.

But that's not even half the story of why this is just incredible, and another huge black eye for the EAC. (How many eyes do they have left to blacken at this point?)  If you're not a long time reader of <a href="http://www.bradblog.com">The BRAD BLOG</a> reader, and don't recall who this Ed Smith is, read on. It's simply stultifying...

<!--more-->

Smith is the guy who, after years of paying a crackpot contractor named Mike Gibbons to do this and that for Sequoia with loads of federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) tax-payer cash, assigned him to do an "independent" analysis of Sequoia's touch-screen machines after they <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5718">failed in NJ's 2008 Super Tuesday election</a>. That was just after Smith had sent a letter <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5814">threatening two Princeton computer scientists with legal action</a> "to stop any infringement of our intellectual properties, including any non-compliant analysis," if they performed the <i>actually</i> independent analysis of the machines as they were <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1205300247279401.xml&coll=1">tasked by NJ election officials to do</a>. (<i>Addtional outrage/irony shortly thereafter <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6005">uncovered by The BRAD BLOG</a></i>: Sequoia didn't even own the Intellectual Property rights to the machines in question. Rather, the IP rights were, and are still to our knowledge, owned by Smartmatic, a Venezuelan firm tied to Hugo Chavez. Sequoia lied to both federal investigators and state election officials about that relationship.)

After <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5839"><a href="http://www.BradBlog.com">The BRAD BLOG</a> exposed who Smith's friend Mike Gibbons actually was</a> -- a Sequoia insider, as well as a drunk and a philanderer with an obnoxious Facebook page seeking a "well endowed blonde nymphomaniac," only to change the page after we'd outed him to feature a photo of him and George Bush Sr. and a professed love of Jesus Christ instead -- Gibbons was fired. (He would be found dead a few months later, the actual cause of which we've never been able to ascertain.) 

Smith was severely reprimanded at Sequoia for the embarrassing incident, and has now been rewarded by moving on to Dominion, which is in partnership with his old friends at Sequoia to supply the new, <a href="http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/local-news-stories/60-st-lawrence-news/8576-ny-23-sequoia-and-the-private-corporate-takeover-of-your-once-public-democracy.html">failed e-voting systems</a> recently deployed, disasterously, for the first time in last November's election -- the one where the results of the NY-23 Special Election for U.S. House will now forever be in question. The Sequoia/Dominion contract to supply faulty, secret vote counting machines to NY-23 is worth some $20 million federal tax-payer dollars.

And now Smith's been been named to <i>advise the EAC</i>, the actual federal body tasked with overseeing, testing, and approving voting systems for federal approval -- the very body that is supposed to <i>oversee</i> the very scams that Smith attempts to pull off with his worthless, broken, easily hacked, often-failed, computerized secret vote-counting systems. And, in the case of the NY systems, they're being used even though they are neither federally nor state certified yet.

This isn't just the Fox in the Hen House. This is the Fox who has already devoured every Hen in the House, in the Hen House. With feathers in his mouth and a sub-machine gun in his hands.

The EAC is an absolute disgrace, and should long ago have been disbanded for one failure after another -- including the approval of virtually every e-voting system in use today, virtually every one of which has failed spectacularly, even as the EAC has refused to <i>decertify</i> any of them. Enough is enough.

<div align="center"><b>* * *</b></div>

<i>The complete Friday press release from the EAC, announcing Smith's appointment, and others, follows in full below...</i>

<div class="document"><img src="http://www.BradBlog.com/Images/eac_logo_small.gif" hspace="6" vspace="3" border="0" align="left">U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
1225 New York Ave. NW - Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
<div class="clear:both;"></div>
________________________________________

<b>For Immediate Release</b>
December 11, 2009

Contact: 
Jeannie Layson 
Sarah Litton
(202) 566-3100 

<b><u>New Technical and Scientific Experts Appointed to EAC's Technical Guidelines Development Committee</u></b>

WASHINGTON- The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) today announced the appointment of four new technical and scientific experts to its Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC), which is charged under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) with assisting EAC in developing federal voluntary voting system guidelines that are used to test and certify voting systems.

The following new members were appointed jointly by EAC and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST):

<b>Steven M. Bellovin, professor of computer science at Columbia University.</b> Dr. Bellovin's research focuses on networks and security. Before joining the Columbia faculty in 2005, he spent many years at Bell Labs and AT&T Labs Research, where he was an AT&T Fellow. He holds a bachelor's degree from Columbia University and a master's and doctorate in computer science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

<b>Diane Cordry Golden, program coordinator for the Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs.</b>  Dr. Cordry Golden has 30 years' experience providing training and technical assistance on disability policy implementation and assistive/accessible technology service delivery to government and nonprofit organizations at the local, state and national level. She has a doctorate in special education administration with an emphasis in disability policy, a master's degree in audiology, and a bachelor's degree in speech-language pathology.

<b>Douglas W. Jones, associate professor of computer science at University of Iowa.</b> Mr. Jones served on the Iowa Board of Examiners for Voting Machines and Electronic Voting Systems for 10 years, where he helped examine and approve voting systems before they were sold to the state's county governments. He testified at the U.S. Civil Rights Commission hearings in Tallahassee, Fla., on January 11, 2001, and was involved in reviewing the federal 2002 Voting System Standards.

<b>Edwin B. Smith, III, vice president of compliance and certification at Dominion Voting Systems.</b> Before joining Dominion Voting Systems, Mr. Smith was vice president of manufacturing, compliance, quality and certification at Sequoia Voting Systems. He also served as the operations manager at Hart InterCivic and the senior director of operations at K*TEC Electronics. He holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix and a Bachelor of Science in engineering technology from Texas A&M.

"We welcome this distinguished group of experts to the committee," said EAC Commissioner Donetta Davidson, the designated federal official of the TGDC. "We've just concluded our first two-day meeting with our new members, and it was filled with spirited, thoughtful and productive exchanges. We are fortunate to have such a dedicated and knowledgeable group of professionals working with us on federal voting system guidelines."

HAVA established the TGDC to support the EAC by providing recommendations on voluntary standards and guidelines related to voting equipment and technologies. The TGDC's first task was to draft the third iteration of federal voting system standards, known as the voluntary voting system guidelines, which EAC issued in December 2005. The TGDC continues to work on future iterations and revisions to the guidelines for consideration by the EAC Standards Board and Board of Advisors, and for ultimate consideration and adoption by EAC.

HAVA requires that members of the TGDC be made up of representatives from the American National Standards Institute, the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the Architectural and Transportation Barrier Compliance Board (commonly referred to as the Access Board), the EAC Standards Board and the EAC Board of Advisors.

These organizations nominate new members to serve on the TGDC. Recent appointments include Access Board member <b>Phillip Jenkins</b>, senior software engineer of the IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center; NASED member <b>Ann McGeehan</b>, director of the elections division, State of Texas Office of the Secretary of State; and EAC Standards Board member <b>Donald Palmer</b>, director of elections, Florida Department of State.

Other members of the committee include <b>Ron Gardner</b>, director of field services, National Federation of the Blind; <b>Linda Lamone</b>, administrator of elections, Maryland State Board of Elections; <b>Paul Miller</b>, voting systems manager, State of Washington, Office of the Secretary of State; <b>Helen Purcell</b>, county recorder, Maricopa County, Arizona; <b>Russ Ragsdale</b>, city and county clerk, City and County of Broomfield, Colorado; and <b>David Wagner</b>, associate professor, EECS Department, University of California-Berkeley. <b>Patrick Gallagher</b>, director of NIST, chairs the committee.

For information on TGDC resolutions, meeting minutes and related information, visit <a href="http://vote.nist.gov">vote.nist.gov</a>. Information about EAC's voting system testing and certification process, including the federal 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, is available at <a href="http://www.eac.gov">www.eac.gov</a>. 

<i>The EAC is an independent commission created by the Help America Vote Act.  The EAC serves as a national clearinghouse and resource of information regarding election administration.  It is charged with administering payments to states and developing guidance to meet HAVA requirements, adopting voluntary voting system guidelines, and accrediting voting system test laboratories and certifying voting equipment.  It is also charged with developing and maintaining a national mail voter registration form. The three EAC commissioners are Gineen Beach, chair; Gracia Hillman, vice chair; and Donetta Davidson. There is one vacancy on the commission.</i></div>

<center><i><b>* * *</b></i></center>

There's a lively discussion in the comments thread over at <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7575">The BRAD BLOG</a>. You're invited to join in with your comments.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/12/disgraceful_discredited_evotin.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/12/disgraceful_discredited_evotin.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Accountability</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Dominion Voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EAC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hart Intercivic</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HAVA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sequoia Voting Systems</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Voting Systems Certification</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Diebold: Return Our Money!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Velvet Revolution and other non-profits have launched a campaign to achieve a refund of all the money -- over $100 million -- that California has spent on Diebold/Premier's failed and faulty electronic voting systems.

We're also calling on the State to hold Diebold accountable. 

Go to the <a href="http://dieboldreturnourmoney.com">Diebold: Return Our Money</a> site to send an email calling for the following:

<strong><ul>
	<li>Diebold/Premier: 'Return Our Money!'</li>
	<li>Secretary of State Bowen: Throw Diebold Out of Our State, Once and For All!</li>
	<li>Attorney General Brown: Investigate! Prosecute! Obtain a Refund!</li>
</ul></strong>

Your email will go directly to Diebold/Premier, and to the offices of Secretary of State Debra Bowen and Attorney General Jerry Brown. 

<a href="http://bit.ly/17tDZC"><strong>Become a fan</a> of this campaign on Facebook!</strong>

With enough support, we'll expand this program to other vendors and other states. Why are we starting with Diebold and with California?

California officials <a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/sos-humboldt-report-to-eac-03-02-09.pdf">recently revealed</a> that ALL of Diebold/Premier's voting systems violate federal certifications guidelines!* These systems illegally do some or all of the following::*

<ul>
	<li>delete ballots without notice</li>
	<li>allow the "permanent" audit log records to be deleted</li>
	<li>fail to properly record deletion of ballots</li>
	<li>insert incorrect time stamps on audit log items.</li>
</ul>

Yet Diebold falsely claimed to meet all federal voting system standards!

We will not stand by and tolerate fraudulent use of our tax dollars! 

Velvet Revolution thanks the following organizations for joining the Diebold: Return Our Money campaign:

After Downing Street
Black Box Voting.org
Citizens for Legitimate Government
Democrats.com
Election Defense Alliance
The Free Press
Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution
Progressive Democrats of America
Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles
Progressive Democrats of the Santa Monica Mountains
Protect California Ballots
Ruckus Society
SavElections Monterey County
SAVE R VOTE
True Vote

Organizations can sign up <a href="mailto:dieboldcampaign@velvetrevolution.us">here</a>.

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/10/diebold_return_our_money.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/10/diebold_return_our_money.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Hot Items</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debra Bowen</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Diebold</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Diebold/Premier</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Jerry Brown</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Velvet Revolution to Diebold: Give California Our Money Back!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Notorious electronic voting company Diebold, which has been hiding its election division under the name Premier Election Solutions, has bilked California taxpayers out of over $100 million dollars for its failed, faulty electronic voting machines.

Velvet Revolution this week launches a new campaign: <a href="http://dieboldreturnourmoney.com">Diebold: Return Our Money!</a>

You can find us at <a href="http://dieboldreturnourmoney.com">DieboldReturnOurMoney.com</a>.

California officials recently revealed that ALL of Diebold/Premier's voting systems violate federal certifications guidelines! These systems illegally do some or all of the following:

<ul>
	<li>delete ballots without notice</li>
	<li>allow the "permanent" audit log records to be deleted</li>
	<li>fail to properly record deletion of ballots</li>
	<li>insert incorrect time stamps on audit log items.</li>
</ul>

Yet Diebold falsely claimed to meet all federal voting system standards. Accordingly, we demand that:

<strong>1) DIEBOLD: RETURN OUR MONEY!:</strong> Diebold/Premier has accepted well over $100 million in county, state and federal taxpayer funds for services which the company knew it could not perform. With California's devastating budget shortfall of $ 45.5 billion dollars, we demand the return of these funds from Diebold. The purchase price for hardware, software licenses, and maintenance fees should be returned to the State within 90 days. If Diebold's announced sale to Election Systems and Software becomes final, California must be fully reimbursed instead from ES&S.
<strong>
2) SOS DEBRA BOWEN: DECERTIFY DIEBOLD!:</strong> Diebold/Premier products, currently used in 20 California counties, violate federal voting system standards and must be immediately and permanently decertified by Secretary of State Debra Bowen.
<strong>
3) AG JERRY BROWN: PROSECUTE DIEBOLD!:</strong> California's Attorney General Jerry Brown must immediately launch a comprehensive criminal investigation into Diebold/Premier's knowing use and sale of faulty election systems that have undermined our elections. Further, unless Diebold/Premier, within 90 days, refunds to California all monies paid for its fraudulent software and equipment, we call on the State of California to file suit against Diebold/Premier seeking the return of funds for breach of contract and fraud.

Visit the campaign page at <a href="http://dieboldreturnourmoney.com">DieboldReturnOurMoney.com</a> to send a quick email to Diebold (c/o than the appropriately-named company representative Chris Riggall), SoS Bowen and AG Brown. Over 400 emails have already been sent in the first 48 hours of this campaign. 

As you may have heard, Diebold has recently been purchased by ES&S, its larger competitor. This purchase adds to the myriad problems with electronic voting yet another: one company's near monopoly on the industry. With the purchase of Diebold, <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7413">ES&S will control approximately 85% of the nation's votes</a>. An antitrust suit has been filed by another e-voting vendor, Hart Intercivic, and election watchdog <a href="http://blackboxvoting.org">BlackBoxVoting</a>.org has filed a <a href="http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/80657.html?1254244733">letter of complaint </a>with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. 

Velvet Revolution's demands for a refund of CA's money paid to Diebold, whether it comes from the Diebold Corporation or from ES&S. 

Help us build momentum by supporting this campaign. 
Tell your friends about it!
Join us on Facebook! (Become a fan of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Velvet-Revolution/76903267177?ref=ts">Velvet Revolution</a> and <a href="http://bit.ly/17tDZC">DieboldReturnOurMoney</a>.)
Follow us on our brand new Twitter feed at vr_tweet.
<a href="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/donate.php">Donate </a>to Velvet Revolution!

VR is joined in the Diebold: Return Our Money! campaign by these fine organizations:

After Downing Street
Black Box Voting.org
Citizens for Legitimate Government
Democrats.com
Election Defense Alliance
The Free Press
Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution
Progressive Democrats of America
Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles
Progressive Democrats of the Santa Monica Mountains
Protect California Ballots
Ruckus Society
SavElections Monterey County
SAVE R VOTE
True Vote

Other California groups or national groups operating in CA are invited to join by sending us an <a href="mailto:dieboldcampaign@velvetrevolution.us">email</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/10/velvet_revolution_to_diebold_g.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/10/velvet_revolution_to_diebold_g.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Black Box Voting</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debra Bowen</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Diebold</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hart Intercivic Refund</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Jerry Brown</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Premier/Diebold</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Diebold Admits to Major Software Flaws</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<h3>Software Bug Allows Ballots To Be Deleted; Audit Trail Won't Catch The Error</h3>

<h3>This Confirms What We've Know For Years, And Yes, We ARE Saying "We Told You So!"</h3>

<h3>Further, this admission shows that Premier Election Solutions (formerly and commonly known as Diebold Election Systems, Inc.) has NEVER been in compliance with federal election laws</h3>

<h3>Their admission calls into question every election anywhere that was run on Premier/Diebold software</h3>

A <a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/sos-humboldt-report-to-eac-03-02-09.pdf" target="_new">new report</a> [pdf, 13 pages] issued by California's Secretary of State and submitted to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission describes how "a serious software programming error in GEMS version 1.18.19 caused the loss of 197 tallied ballots in the November 4, 2008, General Election.  The report also describes several deficiencies in the audit trail logs in GEMS version 1.18.19."

The report also says that Premier/Diebold was aware of the problems for at least four years but did nothing to warn its customers  -- over 1,000 counties across the nation -- about it.

Further, the software error causes votes to be lost, and the number of votes lost "greatly exceeds the maximum allowable error rate established by HAVA [Help America Vote Act]."

As reported by <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Standards+and+Legal+Issues&articleId=9128985&taxonomyId=146" target="_new">Computer World</a>, "defects in the software version violate voting system standards established in 1990 and would have made the systems ineligible for use in an election had they been detected."

So in other words, any and all elections that used Premier/Diebold software, all of which occurred after the 1990 voting system standards were established, were run on illegal software.

According to <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/diebold-admits.html" target="_new">Wired</a>, Kim Alexander of the non-profit <a href="http://www.calvoter.org/" target="_new">California Voter Foundation</a> said that Premier/Diebold's admission "confirmed one of my worst fears.  The audit logs have been the top selling point for vendors hawking paperless voting systems.  They and the jurisdictions that have used paperless voting machines have repeatedly pointed to the audit logs as the primary security mechanism and 'fail-safe' for any glitch that might occur on machines.  To discover that the fail-safe itself is unreliable eliminates one of the key selling points for electronic voting security."

Justin Bales, who is the general service manager for Premier/Diebold's western region, when asked if the company has taken any steps to correct the problem in their GEMS software, <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/diebold-admits.html" target="_new">said</a>, "No, not yet."

Added Bales, "... but now we're taking a serious look at that."

Gee, ya think?  It's only an error that existed for years through countless elections in states all over America.  And <strong><em>only now</em></strong> Premier/Diebold is going to take a "serious look" at the problem?

Premier/Diebold also followed a familiar script used by all the voting systems vendors when equipment or software problems are found; blame the customers!  Premier/Diebold's representative tried to say that this problem is partly the fault of election officials who should have somehow known how to correct this software error despite the company having never told anyone of the problem or provided instructions on how to fix it.

According to our colleagues at <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6995" target="_new">The BRAD BLOG</a>, Humboldt County Registrar of Voters Carolyn Crnich said that she was "offended" by this attempt to shift blame.  "If you [Premier/Diebold] are saying that your system needs to be checked every damn time you turn it on, then I agree with you."

Premier/Diebold continues to hack away at our republic, seemingly determined to make sure America's elections, one of the two pillars on which our entire democratic republic stands (the other being the Constitution) remain unsecure, inaccurate, unverifiable, and even criminal.

Why?  Why does Premier/Diebold hate democracy?  Why do they want the terr'rists to win?

Please excuse the snark, but we're angry about this.  We've been yelling and shouting for years that Premier/Diebold's software is in violation of federal law, and for years we've been begging the "powers that be" to stop this bunch of crooks from having anything to do with American elections.  And for our efforts, we've been either ignored or called conspiracy theorists, sore losers, lunatics, or worse.

On a personal note, your humble blogger <a href="http://www.hellerlegaldefensefund.com/" target="_new">committed a crime</a> in 2004 when I stole and exposed legal documents from the office of Diebold's California attorneys, documents that provided <strong>smoking gun proof</strong> that the corporation had been using <strong>illegal and uncertified</strong> software in the state, that they had been actively lying to the Secretary of State, the taxpayers, and the voters about the use of this software, and that they were working to cover up this crime and prevent it from ever coming to light.

I was convicted of a felony for my theft, was nearly bankrupted, and I remain on probation to this day.  And Diebold?  A civil suit was filed against them and they settled out of court, admitted no wrong-doing, and paid a $2.6 million dollar fine.  That might sound like a hefty penalty, but in 2003, their total revenue was about <strong><a href="http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Diebold" target="_new">$100 million</a></strong>, and in 2004, the company cleared over <strong>$80 million</strong>.  Diebold's 2004 revenue from <strong>only one</strong> of California's many counties, Alameda, was <strong><a href="http://newspapertree.com/politics/383-diebold-s-secret-fears" target="_new">$12.7 million</a></strong>.  So that $2.6 million fine was hardly an appropriate punishment.

And worst of all, their equipment is still being used in California and around the nation.

So it's been a proven fact and known for <strong>years</strong> that this company is corrupt, crooked, and criminal, that they're bunch of anti-democracy hoodlums, liars, and crooks.

And yet they are still running elections in America.  In fact, according to <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/diebold-admits.html" target="_new">Wired</a>, which reported on information gathered at <a href="http://verifiedvoting.org/verifier/searched.php?ec=allall&state=AS&equipment_type%5B%5D=All+Types&vendor%5B%5D=Premier+Election+Solutions+%28Diebold%29&model%5B%5D=All+Models&vvpat=all&submit=Search&rowspp=50&topicText=&stateText=" target="_new">VerifiedVoting.org</a>, Premier/Diebold's criminally inept GEMS software "is used to tabulate votes cast on every Premier/Diebold touch-screen or optical-scan machine, and is used in more than 1,400 election districts in 31 states.  Maryland and Georgia use Premier/Diebold systems exclusively, therefore the GEMS software counts every vote statewide."

So once again we express the hope that finally, once and for all, California and all other states that do business with Premier/Diebold will cease and desist from doing so.  Further, a criminal investigation into the company's behavior should be taken up immediately by the U.S. Dept. of Justice.

Is that too much to ask?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/03/diebold_admits_to_major_softwa.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/03/diebold_admits_to_major_softwa.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Diebold</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GEMS software</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Premier/Diebold</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NY Times:  &quot;Hurdles to Voting Persisted in 2008&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<h3>Study finds 4% - 6% of eligible voters didn't vote or were discouraged from voting due to various problems</h3>

According to a study by the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES), which the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/us/politics/11vote.html" target="_new">describes</a> as "a consortium of more than 150 university researchers, led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who specialize in voting issues," approximately four to five million eligible voters (about 2% - 3% of all voters) didn't cast a ballot in the November, 2008 election because of registration problems or because they didn't receive their absentee ballot in time (or they never received it at all).  This is the same number, roughly, of those who encountered the same problems in the 2000 election.

The report, which was presented to the Senate Rules Committee <a href="http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=CommitteeSchedule.Hearing&Hearing_id=c33b5ae8-aee8-413e-85db-a256ce6169f6" target="_new">today</a> (webcast of today's hearing is available), highlights the problems with registration that about six to eight million Americans encountered when they tried to register to vote for the November election.

According to the Times, Senator Charles E. Schumer, (D) New York, chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, said "It's clear that the high turnout on Nov. 4 of last year simply masked persistent problems that still need to be fixed.  Had the election been close, these problems would have received a lot more attention because they could have made the difference in which candidate won."

Schumer also said that the number of people prevented from voting in 2008 exceeded the popular-vote margin in the previous two presidential elections.

Said Stephen Ansolabehere, a professor of political science at Harvard and the lead author of the study, "Registration issues were for 2008 what machine problems were for the 2000 election."

In a separate report from the National Campaign for Fair Elections of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Jonah Goldman, director of the organization, said their election protection hot line handled more than 240,000 calls from voters during the 2008 election cycle, with more than one-third of the problems being voter registration issues.  Voter registration issues were the largest single source of problems for voters, Goldman said.

Those testifying at today's hearing, in addition to Prof. Ansolabehere and Jonah Goldman, were Curtis Gans, Director Center for the Study of the American Electorate, Nathaniel Persily, Professor of Law and Political Science at Columbia Law School, Chris Nelson, South Dakota Secretary of State, and Kristen Clarke of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Here are some of Sen. Schumer's quotes from today's hearing.

<blockquote>"If voting is the heart of democracy, registering Americans is the life-blood of our republic. ... What the butterfly ballots and hanging chads were in 2000 is what voter registration problems are today."


"Hidden from [sic] the excitement of this past election was the fact the millions of voters, through no fault of their own, were shut out of this process due to deeply rooted problems that need to be fixed."

"As many as seven million eligible and registered voters were denied the right to vote, whether it was a photo ID requirement, list purges, no match/no vote comparisons, or simply because they moved..."

"As many as 9 million additional people were prevented from registering due to deadlines and change-of-residency requirements."

"Put together, you get massive disenfranchisement, and this is undemocratic, and unacceptable."</blockquote>

A webcast of the entire hearing can be viewed <a href="http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=CommitteeSchedule.LiveStream&Hearing_id=c33b5ae8-aee8-413e-85db-a256ce6169f6" target="_new">here</a>.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/03/ny_times_hurdles_to_voting_per.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/03/ny_times_hurdles_to_voting_per.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Voter Disenfranchisement</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Voter ID</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Voter Registration</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Voter Suppression</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>E-VOTE BOMBSHELL: Diebold Tabulator Drops Votes, Allows Undetectable Audit Log Deletion</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<h3>New CA SoS report confirms findings of 'Humboldt Transparency Project', discovers even more egregious failures in widely-used Diebold voting counting system</h3>

<h3>One of the citizens who designed the software, responsible for the startling discoveries, offers his thoughts...</h3>

<em><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6962" target="_new">Cross-posted</a> at <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/">The BRAD BLOG</a></em>.

<em>by Mitch Trachtenberg of the Humboldt County Election Transparency Project</em>

California Secretary of State Debra Bowen has released a remarkable <a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/sos-humboldt-report-to-eac-03-02-09.pdf" target="_new">13-page report</a> [PDF] of her office's investigation into how the Diebold/Premier GEMS software silently dropped all votes contained on 197 ballots from Humboldt County, California's November 2008 general election.

The report shows that this version of GEMS not only deleted a batch of ballots without  <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="DieboldGEMS_AuditLog_ClearButton_HackAndCover.jpg" src="http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/DieboldGEMS_AuditLog_ClearButton_HackAndCover.jpg" width="217" height="196" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>   any request by --- or alert to --- the elections staff, but also failed to note the deletion in the system's audit log. The report also points to other startling deficiencies with Diebold/Premier's software: "Key audit trail logs in GEMS version 1.18.19 do not record important operator interventions such as deletion of decks of ballots, assign inaccurate date and time stamps to events that are recorded, and can be deleted by the operator."

That's right. The Diebold/Premier vote tabulation system in question, not only fails to record all events accurately, and sometimes at all, it also allows for anyone with access to the system, to completely delete audit logs, covering the tracks of any tampering that may have occurred, at any time, on the system.

Any of these flaws, the report concludes, "appears to violate the 1990 Voting System Standards to an extent that would have warranted failure of the GEMS version 1.18.19 system had they been detected and reported by the [federal] Independent Testing Authority [ITA] that tested the system."...]]></description>
         <link>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/03/evote_bombshell_diebold_tabula.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/2009/03/evote_bombshell_diebold_tabula.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Accountability</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debra Bowen</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Diebold/Premier</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EAC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election 2008</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election Fraud</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election Irregularities</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election Reform</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Humboldt County</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Voting System Certification</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
