Logo
logo

Attorney in Ohio Election Fraud Case Offers Cooperation for Investigation into California's Proposition 8

Arnebeck cites exit poll discrepancy

Cliff Arnebeck, the Ohio attorney currently litigating the groundbreaking suit regarding alleged manipulation of the 2004 presidential election in Ohio, has written a letter to California Secretary of State Debra Bowen expressing concerns regarding the proposition 8 vote count. Arnebeck's voice echoes Velvet Revolution's call for an investigation of the vote on Prop 8, which amended California's state constitution to eliminate marriage equality.

Arnebeck raises questions about the Prop 8 vote count based on discrepancies between exit polls -- which are used worldwide to flag suspicious election results -- and official vote totals, such as detailed here at the Velvet Revolution Election Protection Strike Force. The California portion of the National Exit Poll initially showed Prop 8 being defeated; then the poll results were adjusted to match election night vote tallies and showed Prop 8 passing.

Arnebeck writes, "Based on information we have received, it appears that this year's California Proposition 8 election reflects such an exit poll discrepancy. The issue presented in Proposition 8 is part of the national culture war that Mr. Rove and his associates seek to perpetuate. Therefore, we want you to know of our interest in this election and our interest in cooperating with you in any review you may conduct in this matter." The full text of Arnebeck's letter is reprinted below and also available in .pdf form below.

Arnebeck informs Bowen in his letter that he intends to subpoena the "underlying exit poll data for Proposition 8 election. This is a part of our effort to assist the new generation of honest law enforcement authorities, of which you are such a prominent part, for the purpose of further documenting and terminating the pattern of corrupt activity in which Mr. Rove and his associates have heretofore engaged."

The Ohio lawsuit, King Lincoln v. Blackwell, in which Velvet Revolution is involved, is summarized on the Strike Force blog here and detailed on Velvet Revolution's dedicated website, RoveCybergate.com. The suit intends to show that "IT guru" Mike Connell manipulated the vote totals in the 2004 presidential election in Ohio via a scheme that involved rerouting election data through computer servers he controlled in Tennessee. See also Rove Is A Common Criminal.

Read the full text of attorney Cliff Arnebeck's letter to Secretary of State Debra Bowen Cal Prop 8 letter.pdf(.pdf) or 'below the fold.' Velvet Revolution has not yet been told whether or not Bowen's office will investigate the Prop 8 vote count. Our call for an investigation is based on a variety of indications of problems with the vote count resulting in complete absence of a basis for voter confidence in the announced results of this discriminatory ballot measure.

December 11, 2008

The Honorable Debra Bowen
California Secretary of State
1500 11th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
FAX: 916-653-4795

RE: Integrity of the Proposition 8 Vote Count

Dear Secretary Bowen:

I represent clients challenging the 2004 presidential election in Ohio as part of an ongoing civil rights conspiracy. Over the past months, new whistle blowers have come forward with detailed evidence of how Karl Rove, on behalf of tobacco and political clients, and with the assistance of law enforcement agencies in Ohio between 2000 and 2006 and the United States Justice Department during his tenure in the White House, has corrupted the national electoral process through various means, including manipulation of electronic vote tabulators.

Although Ohio was Mr. Rove's central target in the 2004 presidential election, the scope of our inquiry and evidence has broadened to include all elections of national significance in this decade where media-sponsored professional exit polling has indicated the likelihood of fraudulent manipulation of the vote count.

Based on information we have received, it appears that this year's California Proposition 8 election reflects such an exit poll discrepancy. The issue presented in Proposition 8 is part of the national culture war that Mr. Rove and his associates seek to perpetuate. Therefore, we want you to know of our interest in this election and our interest in cooperating with you in any review you may conduct in this matter.

In furtherance of our litigation, we intend to subpoena the underlying exit poll data for Proposition 8 election. This is a part of our effort to assist the new generation of honest law enforcement authorities, of which you are such a prominent part, for the purpose of further documenting and terminating the pattern of corrupt activity in which Mr. Rove and his associates have heretofore engaged.

Sincerely yours,

/s/

Clifford O. Arnebeck, Jr.
Attorney at Law



Paid for by VelvetRevolution.us. Velvet Revolution and Velvet Revolution Election Protection
Strike Force are not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
contact | login